AMD CDNA 3 Architecture White Paper

hardware amd-cdna3-whitepaper
gpu-architecturechipletmi300xmi325xcdna3hbm3

AMD CDNA 3 Architecture White Paper #

AMD | 2023-12 | https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/instinct-business-docs/white-papers/amd-cdna3-white-paper.pdf Category: hardware | Tags: gpu-architecture, matrix-core, chiplet, mi300x, mi325x, cdna3, 3d-stacking, infinity-cache Read: 2026-04-16

Core Contribution #

AMD革命性chiplet GPU架构CDNA 3,通过8个XCD(5nm)+4个IOD(6nm)的3D堆叠实现前所未有的计算密度,引入FP8/TF32/2:4稀疏,并以256MB Infinity Cache和192-256GB HBM3/3E显存成为LLM推理的有力竞争者。

Summary #

CDNA 3是GPU架构的范式转换——从传统monolithic/MCM演进为真正的异构chiplet 3D堆叠。MI300X由12个chiplet组成:8个XCD(Accelerator Complex Die, TSMC 5nm)承载计算单元,4个IOD(I/O Die, TSMC 6nm)承载Infinity Fabric控制器、HBM PHY、PCIe控制器和256MB Infinity Cache。XCD与IOD通过3D堆叠连接,实现了极高的通信带宽和能效。

304个CU(38/XCD)在FP8精度下达到2,614.9 TFLOPS,FP16达1,307.4 TFLOPS,首次支持OCP FP8标准(E4M3/E5M2)和TF32格式(490.3 TFLOPS)。2:4结构化稀疏支持可将FP16/BF16/FP8/INT8矩阵吞吐翻倍。

MI300X配备192GB HBM3(5.3TB/s),MI325X升级至256GB HBM3E(6.0TB/s)。256MB Infinity Cache提供17.2TB/s带宽,大幅缓解内存墙。7条IF链路实现8-GPU全互联节点。MI300A APU变体将CPU和GPU统一封装并共享HBM3,开创新的异构计算范式。

Key Findings #

Key Tables #

Table 1: MI300X / MI325X 完整性能规格 #

ComputationMI300XMI325X
FP64 Vector81.7 TFLOPS81.7 TFLOPS
FP64 Matrix163.4 TFLOPS163.4 TFLOPS
FP32 Matrix163.4 TFLOPS163.4 TFLOPS
TF32 Matrix490.3 TFLOPS490.3 TFLOPS
FP16 Matrix1,307.4 TFLOPS1,307.4 TFLOPS
BF16 Matrix1,307.4 TFLOPS1,307.4 TFLOPS
FP8 Matrix2,614.9 TFLOPS2,614.9 TFLOPS
INT8 Matrix2,614.9 TOPS2,614.9 TOPS
2:4 SparsityFP16/BF16/FP8/INT8FP16/BF16/FP8/INT8
显存192 GB HBM3256 GB HBM3E
显存带宽5.3 TB/s6.0 TB/s

Takeaway: 计算性能MI300X/MI325X完全一致,MI325X的差异化在于HBM3E升级(+64GB, +0.7TB/s)

Table 2: MI300X vs MI250X 代际对比 #

指标MI300XMI250X提升
CU3042201.38x
FP64 Matrix163.4 TF95.7 TF1.71x
FP16 Matrix1,307 TF383 TF3.41x
FP8 Matrix2,615 TFN/A新能力
显存192 GB128 GB1.5x
带宽5.3 TB/s3.2 TB/s1.66x
Infinity Cache256 MBN/A新能力

Takeaway: FP16 3.4x提升来自CU增加+per-CU矩阵吞吐提升,FP8和Infinity Cache为全新能力

Table 3: MI300X vs H100 SXM5 竞争对比 #

指标MI300XH100 SXM5对比
FP64 Matrix163.4 TF66.9 TFAMD 2.4x
FP16 TC1,307 TF989 TFAMD +32%
FP8 TC2,615 TF1,979 TFAMD +32%
显存192 GB80 GBAMD 2.4x
带宽5.3 TB/s3.35 TB/sAMD +58%
L2+LLC32+256 MB50 MBAMD 5.7x

Takeaway: MI300X在AI性能、显存容量、带宽上首次全面超越同代NVIDIA旗舰

Limitations #

Infrastructure Impact #


Deep Analysis (hardware) #

Figure 1: MI300 Series 3D Package Chiplet Construction #

Figure 1

解读: AMD Instinct MI300系列的3D封装chiplet构造示意图。这是AMD GPU架构的范式转变——从monolithic/MCM进化到真正的异构chiplet 3D堆叠。底层是4个IOD(I/O Die, TSMC 6nm),包含Infinity Cache和HBM3内存控制器。上层是8个XCD(Accelerator Complex Die, TSMC 5nm),包含计算单元和L2 Cache。XCD通过3D堆叠垂直置于IOD之上。四周是8个HBM3 memory stacks(每stack 24GB, 总192GB)。IOD之间通过Infinity Fabric互联。MI300A APU变体将3个CCD(Zen4 CPU die)替代3个XCD,实现CPU+GPU统一封装。

Figure 2: MI300X and MI300A Block Diagrams #

Figure 2

解读: MI300X(纯GPU)和MI300A(APU)的block diagram对比。MI300X: 8个XCD + 4个IOD + 8个HBM3 stacks,304个CU(38/XCD),192GB显存。MI300A: 6个XCD + 3个CCD(Zen4) + 4个IOD + 8个HBM3 stacks,228个CU + 24个Zen4核心,CPU和GPU共享128GB统一HBM3内存(消除了传统架构中CPU-GPU数据拷贝开销)。

Figure 3: XCD Block Diagram #

Figure 3

解读: 单个XCD(Accelerator Complex Die)的内部block diagram。包含:HWS(硬件调度器)、4个ACE(异步计算引擎)分别管理40个CU(产品启用38个,2个禁用用于良率)、4MB共享L2 Cache(16-way set assoc, 16通道)。L2作为XCD与Infinity Fabric网络的唯一接口——所有离开XCD的流量必须经过L2。这是AMD chiplet策略的核心构建块——小die+高良率,通过Infinity Fabric组合成大GPU。

Figure 4: CDNA3 Enhanced CU Architecture #

Figure 4

解读: CDNA 3 CU内部架构图。关键增强:(1)Matrix Core Unit新增FP8(E4M3/E5M2)和TF32支持,INT8吞吐提升6.8x vs CDNA2;(2)FP16/BF16吞吐翻倍至2048 FLOPS/clk/CU;(3)L1向量数据缓存容量翻倍至32KB(128B cache lines),带宽翻倍;(4)指令缓存64KB(2x),两CU共享;(5)支持2:4结构化稀疏(首次),Matrix Core可跳过零值计算实现吞吐翻倍。CU内部保持Scalar+Vector+Matrix+Memory四条并行pipeline。

Figure 5: CDNA3 Memory Architecture #

Figure 5

解读: CDNA 3完整内存层次结构图——这是理解chiplet架构数据流的关键图。从上到下:CU内(L1 32KB, LDS 64KB) → XCD内(L2 4MB, 绿色通路 51.6 TB/s聚合) → 跨Infinity Fabric(黄色通路 17.2 TB/s聚合) → IOD内(Infinity Cache 256MB, 红色通路 5.3 TB/s聚合) → HBM3(192GB)。三种颜色的连线清晰标注了每一级的带宽。Infinity Cache是全新引入的memory-side cache——不参与coherency,仅缓存HBM内容,减少off-chip访问,提供17.2 TB/s的巨大带宽放大。

1. Architecture Overview #

Per-Chiplet Bandwidth Breakdown (逐chiplet带宽分拆) #

全芯片聚合带宽掩盖了单个chiplet的实际可用带宽。对kernel优化至关重要的是per-XCD视角:

LevelPer-XCDPer-IODTotal (8 XCD / 4 IOD)推导
L2 Read BW4.3 TB/s12.9 TB/s34.4 TB/s\(128\ \text{B} \times 16\ \text{ch} \times 2.1\ \text{GHz}\)
L2 Write BW2.15 TB/s6.45 TB/s17.2 TB/s\(64\ \text{B} \times 16\ \text{ch} \times 2.1\ \text{GHz}\)
L2 Total BW6.45 TB/s19.35 TB/s51.6 TB/sRead + Write ✓
LLC (Infinity Cache) BW2.15 TB/s4.3 TB/s17.2 TB/s\(64\ \text{B} \times 16\ \text{ch} \times f_{\text{clk}}\)
HBM BW0.66 TB/s1.325 TB/s5.3 TB/s\(1{,}024\ \text{b} \times 5.2\ \text{Gbps}\)

关键洞察: 单个XCD只有0.66 TB/s的HBM带宽,对memory-bound kernel而言,数据局部性(L2 hit)至关重要——L2提供 \(6.5\times\) 的带宽放大(\(4.3\) vs \(0.66\ \text{TB/s}\))。跨XCD数据访问必须经过Infinity Fabric→LLC→HBM路径,带宽急剧下降。这解释了为什么CDNA3的NUMA-aware kernel优化如此重要。

2. Generational Delta (vs CDNA 2 / MI250X) #

新增: Chiplet 3D堆叠, Infinity Cache (256MB), FP8 (OCP E4M3/E5M2), TF32, 2:4结构化稀疏, GPU分区(最多8分区), MI300A APU

移除: 无

增强: CU 304(vs 220), 工艺5nm+6nm(vs 7nm), HBM3/3E(vs HBM2e), 显存192-256GB(vs 128GB), 带宽5.3-6.0TB/s(vs 3.2TB/s), 7x IF链路(vs 8x external)

3. Compute Unit Deep Dive #

4. Peak Performance Derivation #

\( f_{\text{boost}} \approx 2.1\ \text{GHz} \) (MI300X)

\[ \text{BF16 Matrix} = 2048\ \frac{\text{FLOPS}}{\text{clk}\cdot\text{CU}} \times 304\ \text{CU} \times 2.1\ \text{GHz} = 1{,}307\ \text{TFLOPS} \]

\[ \text{FP8 Matrix} = 4096\ \frac{\text{FLOPS}}{\text{clk}\cdot\text{CU}} \times 304\ \text{CU} \times 2.1\ \text{GHz} = 2{,}615\ \text{TFLOPS} \]

\[ \text{FP32 Vector} = 256\ \frac{\text{FLOPS}}{\text{clk}\cdot\text{CU}} \times 304\ \text{CU} \times 2.1\ \text{GHz} = 163.4\ \text{TFLOPS} \]

\[ \text{FP64 Matrix} = 256\ \frac{\text{FLOPS}}{\text{clk}\cdot\text{CU}} \times 304\ \text{CU} \times 2.1\ \text{GHz} = 163.4\ \text{TFLOPS} \]

Data TypeFLOPS/clk/CUPeak TFLOPS
FP64 Vector12881.7
FP64 Matrix256163.4
FP32 Matrix256163.4
TF32 Matrix1,024490.3
FP16 Matrix2,0481,307.4
BF16 Matrix2,0481,307.4
FP8 Matrix4,0962,614.9
INT8 Matrix4,0962,614.9 TOPS

5. Memory Subsystem #

\[ \text{BW}_{\text{HBM}} = \frac{1024\ \text{bits} \times 5.2\ \text{Gbps} \times 8\ \text{stacks}}{8} = 5{,}324\ \text{GB/s} \approx 5.3\ \text{TB/s} \]

\[ \beta_{\text{FP8}} = \frac{2{,}615\ \text{TFLOPS}}{5.3\ \text{TB/s}} = 493\ \text{Ops/Byte} \]

\[ \beta_{\text{FP16}} = \frac{1{,}307\ \text{TFLOPS}}{5.3\ \text{TB/s}} = 247\ \text{Ops/Byte} \]

6. Interconnect #

\[ \text{BW}_{\text{IF,link}} = \frac{16\ \text{lanes} \times 32\ \text{Gbps} \times 2}{8} = 128\ \text{GB/s} \]

\[ \text{BW}_{\text{P2P,total}} = 128\ \text{GB/s} \times 7\ \text{links} = 896\ \text{GB/s} \]

7. Software & ISA #